TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP OMEN by HP 40L Gaming Desktop PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 230%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 266%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 121%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics195% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive201% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP OMEN by HP 40L Gaming Desktop PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8917
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 03 '23 at 12:20
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900K-$277
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Memory 90.4
1-Core 212
2-Core 415
125% 239 Pts
4-Core 811
8-Core 1,517
139% 1,164 Pts
64-Core 2,823
175% 2,823 Pts
Poor: 107% ↑
This bench: 121%
 Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$435
HP(103C 88D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 531.30
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
195% Outstanding
Lighting 284
Reflection 256
Parallax 294
232% 278 fps
MRender 326
Gravity 238
Splatting 174
193% 246 fps
Poor: 163% ↑
This bench: 195%
 Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00-1006 1TB
896GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1274 782 806 814 816 822 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
201% Outstanding
Read 1,405
Write 1,603
Mixed 1283
SusWrite 886
292% 1,294 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 99.9
4K Mixed 55.7
187% 65.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,052
DQ Write 415
DQ Mixed 825
586% 764 MB/s
Poor: 144% ↑
This bench: 201%
 Great: 275%
WDC WD20EZBX-60AYRA0 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 231 232 223 231 231 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 237
Write 225
Mixed 137
SusWrite 229
47% 207 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 14
4K Mixed 1.3
61% 16.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1.6
DQ Write 8.9
DQ Mixed 1.1
2% 3.87 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑
This bench: 39.9%
 Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP37D4U1S8ME-16X 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 40.7
MC Write 39.2
MC Mixed 37.7
112% 39.2 GB/s
SC Read 25.8
SC Write 44.4
SC Mixed 31.4
97% 33.9 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 80% ↑
This bench: 109%
 Great: 114%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical OMEN by HP 40L Gaming Desktop PC Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 178%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 195%
UFO

System: HP OMEN by HP 40L Gaming Desktop PC

CPU
Core i7-12700KIntel  $215Bench 114%, 78,749 samples9x
Core i9-12900KIntel  $277Bench 117%, 66,991 samples3x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD  $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples1x
GPU
RTX 3070-TiNvidia  $479Bench 158%, 218,061 samples7x
RTX 3080Nvidia  $435Bench 187%, 424,051 samples3x
RTX 3060Nvidia  $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples3x
SSD
WD WD_BLACK Gen4 SDCPNRY-1T00-1106 1TBNvmeBench 379%, 676 samples7x
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00-1006 1TBNvmeBench 205%, 2,140 samples2x
KXG60PNV2T04 KIOXIA 2TBNvmeBench 203%, 110 samples2x
RAM
HP37D4U1S8ME-8XR 2x8GBKingstonBench 90%, 6,088 samples6x
HP37D4U1S8ME-16X 2x16GBKingstonBench 95%, 439 samples3x
HP37D4U1S8HC-16XR 2x16GBKingstonBench 101%, 644 samples2x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $694
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback