HP EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
12 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8054
Memory7.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 02 '23 at 19:05
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600-$133
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Memory 54.1
1-Core 104
2-Core 190
63% 116 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 352
46% 346 Pts
64-Core 359
22% 359 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 8054) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
3.08% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 5.2
4% 4.37 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.2
1% 1.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.08%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TY256HDHP-000H1 256GB
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01H3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 218 218 223 225 217 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
70.6% Very good
Read 236
Write 216
Mixed 181
SusWrite 225
48% 214 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 43.3
4K Mixed 37.1
102% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 305
234% 320 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264AZ-2G3B1 Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
27.4% Poor
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 6.7
27% 9.47 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 8.8
24% 8.37 GB/s
Latency 146
27% 146 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF Builds (Compare 2,998 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback