Sony SVS1511BFXB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSony SVS1511BFXB  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120517
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 01 '23 at 23:02
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3612QM
N/A, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Memory 76.2
1-Core 73.2
2-Core 142
58% 97.3 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 249
26% 210 Pts
64-Core 265
16% 265 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sony(104D 909C) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
2.1% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 2.7
3% 4.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.1%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HGST Travelstar 7K750 2.5" 640GB
415GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JFDO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 86 86 90 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 95.6
Write 109
Mixed 57.1
SusWrite 85.2
64% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 64%
Seagate FreeAgent 1TB
850GB free, PID 3008
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Read 36.5
Write 38.5
Mixed 29.1
SusWrite 38.7
49% 35.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
72% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
44.7% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 14.4
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 13.1
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 87.9
46% 87.9 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SVS1511BFXB Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Sony SVS1511BFXB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $76
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback