TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170505
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 01 '23 at 20:36
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 65.9
1-Core 103
2-Core 205
69% 125 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 623
60% 497 Pts
64-Core 680
42% 680 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑
This bench: 67.5%
 Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85D6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 535.98
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.4% Poor
Lighting 34.5
Reflection 37.9
Parallax 35.6
28% 36 fps
MRender 36.1
Gravity 36.6
Splatting 25.7
26% 32.8 fps
Poor: 27% ↑
This bench: 27.4%
 Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fast DATA 240G 240GB
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1104C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 366 291 374 182 13 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 427
Write 403
Mixed 340
SusWrite 254
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 75.9
4K Mixed 12.3
107% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 15.6
68% 147 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 72.4%
 Great: 96%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 188 183 185 185 186 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 213
Write 177
Mixed 111
SusWrite 185
126% 171 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
235% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 114%
 Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFS8213.C8FDR1 F4-2133C15-8GIS 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64.9% Good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 23.5
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 18.9
53% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,150 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD  $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples1,471x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD  $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples1,313x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD  $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples1,011x
GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples958x
RX 570AMD  $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples745x
GTX 1650Nvidia  $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples658x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples719x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples343x
Green 240GB (2018)WD  $56Bench 45%, 156,194 samples286x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples295x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples230x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX  $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples204x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback