Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	12.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2658 v2 83 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	62.3% Good	Memory 73.9 1-Core 68.4 2-Core 136 56% 92.8 Pts	4-Core 273 8-Core 469 45% 371 Pts	64-Core 868 54% 868 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon 550 8,236 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Dell(1028 0039) 2GB CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.30.18.08 Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Lighting 14.9 Reflection 21.1 Parallax 20.2 12% 18.7 fps	MRender 13.1 Gravity 15.5 Splatting 17.3 13% 15.3 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 15%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU635 480GB-$40 5,092 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 411GB free (System drive) Firmware: XD0R4D03 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	Read 256 Write 237 Mixed 221 53% 238 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 46.3 4K Mixed 28.9 99% 33.2 MB/s	DQ Read 132 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 187 133% 168 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 103%
KIOXIA TransMemory 16GB 446 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 11GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 29.1 Write 5.2 Mixed 13.8 17% 16 MB/s	4K Read 6.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.4 37% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C HMT151R7BFR4C HMT151R7BFR4C HMT151R7TFR4C 16GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	42.9% Average	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 29.3 MC Mixed 10.9 46% 16 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 6.8 22% 7.7 GB/s	Latency 92.7 43% 92.7 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 86%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 2,611 samples	76x
M393B1K70DH0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 91%, 1,639 samples	16x
M393B5170GB0- 3x4GBSamsungBench 73%, 90 samples	7x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16