AZW SER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics18% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAZW SER  (all builds)
MotherboardAZW SER
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230215
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 31 '23 at 15:45
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Memory 82.1
1-Core 165
2-Core 324
101% 190 Pts
4-Core 592
8-Core 998
97% 795 Pts
64-Core 1105
68% 1105 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 0123) 3GB
Ram: 3GB, Driver: 23.5.1
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
18% Very poor
Lighting 22.2
Reflection 22.1
Parallax 32.1
18% 25.5 fps
MRender 15.8
Gravity 26
Splatting 22.6
18% 21.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8SEP4512N-A0 512GB
372GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM01100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1251 1265 1268 493 299 424 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 1,978
Write 1,289
Mixed 1,244
SusWrite 833
298% 1,336 MB/s
4K Read 49.2
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 41.5
205% 78.9 MB/s
DQ Read 402
DQ Write 1,056
DQ Mixed 427
413% 628 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 223%
Great: 247%
Seagate BarraCuda SSD ZA1000CM10002 1TB
840GB free
Firmware: STAS1024
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 446 137 456 454 459 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 488
Write 458
Mixed 360
SusWrite 399
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 47.4
4K Mixed 30.6
100% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 259
DQ Mixed 196
167% 245 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFS832A.C8FF 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
MC Read 30
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 28.6
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 26.7
SC Write 43.5
SC Mixed 31.6
97% 33.9 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SER Builds (Compare 791 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: AZW SER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback