Win M600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics34.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive477% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemWin M600  (all builds)
MotherboardWin M600
Memory55.9 GB free of 64 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 31 '23 at 12:18
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Memory 75
1-Core 164
2-Core 318
98% 185 Pts
4-Core 621
8-Core 1,075
103% 848 Pts
64-Core 1,320
82% 1,320 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
AMD(1002 0124) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Lighting 42.5
Reflection 51.4
Parallax 75.1
35% 56.3 fps
MRender 25.8
Gravity 43.8
Splatting 52.6
35% 40.7 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT2000P3PSSD8 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR40A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3767 3653 3983 4138 4136 4119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
477% Outstanding
Read 2,153
Write 4,014
Mixed 2,446
SusWrite 3966
716% 3,145 MB/s
4K Read 51.4
4K Write 227
4K Mixed 85.8
308% 121 MB/s
DQ Read 1,351
DQ Write 1,064
DQ Mixed 1,259
928% 1,224 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 477%
Great: 517%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G52C42S5.M16G1 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h 5200 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
128% Outstanding
MC Read 46.5
MC Write 51.3
MC Mixed 45
136% 47.6 GB/s
SC Read 28
SC Write 51.6
SC Mixed 33.1
107% 37.6 GB/s
Latency 90.4
44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 111%
This bench: 128%
Great: 173%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M600 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

System: Win M600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback