QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory3.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 31 '23 at 08:33
Run Duration81 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E-2278G
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.6% Very good
Memory 74.4
1-Core 135
2-Core 257
84% 155 Pts
4-Core 449
8-Core 485
62% 467 Pts
64-Core 509
32% 509 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID RTX6000-4Q
Nvidia(10DE 1328) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.6% Below average
Lighting 43.2
Reflection 48.7
Parallax 41.2
35% 44.4 fps
MRender 49.7
Gravity 39.8
Splatting 44.2
36% 44.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 73%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 54GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 955
Write 900
Mixed 855
202% 904 MB/s
4K Read 48.2
4K Write 46.2
4K Mixed 40.6
150% 45 MB/s
DQ Read 66.5
DQ Write 57
DQ Mixed 53.6
42% 59 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x6GB
1 of 1 slots used
6GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
82.4% Excellent
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 34.9
MC Mixed 27.9
87% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 32.3
SC Mixed 20.4
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 91.6
44% 91.6 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback