Acer Nitro AN515-42

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics13.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
12 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-42  (all builds)
MotherboardRR Freed_RRS
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200618
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 31 '23 at 06:42
Run Duration386 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
41.1% Average
Memory 43.2
1-Core 93.6
2-Core 160
54% 98.9 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 253
31% 236 Pts
64-Core 276
17% 276 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560X
Acer(1025 125D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 30.0.15002.1004
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Lighting 11.4
Reflection 0
Parallax 33.4
9% 14.9 fps
MRender 24.9
Gravity 30.6
Splatting 22.8
21% 26.1 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 24%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 SSD 512GB
336GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 398
Write 341
Mixed 326
79% 355 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 34.8
4K Mixed 22.9
81% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 126
97% 132 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 94%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
716GB free
Firmware: 02.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 110
Write 84.5
Mixed 47.8
60% 80.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
130% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
33% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 10.9
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 9.1
27% 9.3 GB/s
Latency 188
21% 188 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-42 Builds (Compare 865 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-42

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback