User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemHUANANZHI
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-F8D PLUS
Memory120.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220906
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 31 '23 at 00:02
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 79.5
1-Core 101
2-Core 204
72% 128 Pts
4-Core 406
8-Core 681
66% 544 Pts
64-Core 3,384
210% 3,384 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
MSI(1462 3609) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 531.61
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
128% Outstanding
Lighting 175
Reflection 192
Parallax 199
143% 189 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 180
Splatting 125
118% 147 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 128%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adaptec Array 1.5TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,797
Write 2,571
Mixed 2,709
601% 2,692 MB/s
4K Read 60.7
4K Write 55.7
4K Mixed 56.2
194% 57.5 MB/s
DQ Read 598
DQ Write 373
DQ Mixed 437
339% 470 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 71%
Adaptec Array 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: V1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 2,815
Write 2,502
Mixed 2,703
597% 2,673 MB/s
4K Read 55.7
4K Write 55.5
4K Mixed 57.7
188% 56.3 MB/s
DQ Read 553
DQ Write 374
DQ Mixed 418
324% 448 MB/s
Adaptec Array 8TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: V1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 2,880
Write 2,626
Mixed 2,534
598% 2,680 MB/s
4K Read 61.3
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 58.2
197% 58.7 MB/s
DQ Read 492
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 340
267% 374 MB/s
Kingston SNVS250G 250GB
465GB free
Firmware: S8H40103
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2144
Write 2,021
Mixed 1,251
401% 1,806 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 63
4K Mixed 20.2
110% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 675
DQ Write 445
DQ Mixed 270
280% 463 MB/s
Poor: 94% Great: 211%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9965698-021.A00G 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (100th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
119% Outstanding
MC Read 55.3
MC Write 41.7
MC Mixed 46
136% 47.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 16.9
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 81.6
49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 115%
This bench: 119%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback