Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING S  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180621
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '23 at 23:27
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User BOL-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$95
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 83.7
1-Core 121
2-Core 242
83% 149 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 681
73% 582 Pts
64-Core 605
37% 605 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 864B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.68
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.4% Below average
Lighting 44.3
Reflection 42.8
Parallax 40.3
36% 42.5 fps
MRender 37.7
Gravity 43.4
Splatting 0.3
20% 27.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 13 15 12 21 32 MB/s
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.6% Average
Read 282
Write 72.2
Mixed 266
SusWrite 17.1
35% 159 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 40.3
4K Mixed 25.7
93% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 27.5
DQ Write 41.9
DQ Mixed 28.6
23% 32.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
548GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 31 31 22 24 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 130
Write 79
Mixed 74
SusWrite 27.8
58% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 114%
Ccdisk iSCSI 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 31 30 31 29 32 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Read 65.5
Write 51.7
Mixed 59
SusWrite 30.2
39% 51.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 3.4
758% 5.6 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.9% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 11.6
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 13.3
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING S Builds (Compare 1,342 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING S - $113

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $453
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback