Asus X453SA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics2.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive10.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X453SA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X453SA
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20151014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '23 at 20:30
Run Duration707 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3050
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 0.4 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 3.2
2-Core 5.6
2% 4.4 Pts
4-Core 4
8-Core 0.7
0% 2.35 Pts
64-Core 0.8
0% 0.8 Pts
Poor: 8% Great: 27%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Asus(1043 1CBD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5107
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.19% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 2.9
2% 2.33 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 3.1
Splatting 3.3
3% 3.43 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.19%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 2.5 480GB
362GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42059100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 27 35 21 62 0.9 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
10.4% Very poor
Read 104
Write 85.2
Mixed 187
SusWrite 29
23% 101 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 4.1
14% 4.63 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6MFR8C-C9 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
2.75% Terrible
MC Read 0.8
MC Write 0.5
MC Mixed 1.5
3% 0.93 GB/s
SC Read 0.1
SC Write 0.2
SC Mixed 0.1
0% 0.13 GB/s
Latency 511
8% 511 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 2.75%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X453SA Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 11%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X453SA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $251Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback