Gigabyte GA-Z370M AORUS Gaming-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Sail boat	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

12 months ago, 12 months ago.

System	Gigabyte Z370M AORUS Gaming
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z370M AORUS Gaming-CF (all builds)
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190813
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 30 '23 at 15:59
Run Duration	112 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600KF-$180 65,122 User benchmarks, average bench 93% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	86.3% Excellent	Memory 85.2 1-Core 137 2-Core 271 90% 164 Pts	4-Core 470 8-Core 731 74% 600 Pts	64-Core 764 47% 764 Pts
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 102%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 378E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.49 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.2% Poor	Lighting 35.5 Reflection 39.2 Parallax 0.1 29% 24.9 fps	MRender 36.8 Gravity 37.2 Splatting 26.3 27% 33.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
R5SL240G 240GB 783 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 112GB free (System drive) Firmware: V0205 SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 0.5 58 76 123 84 MB/s Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.6% Below average	Read 208 Write 54.9 Mixed 52.8 SusWrite 113 24% 107 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 15 4K Mixed 9.2 44% 13.5 MB/s	DQ Read 16.6 DQ Write 311 DQ Mixed 164 127% 164 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT8G4DFS824A.M8FH3 859B CT8G4DFS824A.M8FH 16GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	75.4% Very good	MC Read 29.2 MC Write 29.4 MC Mixed 21.5 76% 26.7 GB/s	SC Read 17.3 SC Write 30.3 SC Mixed 21.9 66% 23.2 GB/s	Latency 71.8 56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z370M AORUS Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 731 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 54%

Yacht

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 50%

Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370M AORUS Gaming-CF

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $179Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	133x
Core i7-8700Intel $186Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	113x
Core i5-8400Intel $114Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	109x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	88x
RTX 2060Nvidia $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	66x
RTX 3060Nvidia $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	41x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	71x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	39x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	18x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	61x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 76%, 20,001 samples	23x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $324

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16