ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Aspire XC-730

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago.

System	Acer Aspire XC-730 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Aspire XC-730
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20171019
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 30 '23 at 12:55
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J3355 929 User benchmarks, average bench 25% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	24.6% Poor	Memory 39 1-Core 40.5 2-Core 60 29% 46.5 Pts	4-Core 60 8-Core 61.6 8% 60.8 Pts	64-Core 60.3 4% 60.3 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 31%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
:intel HD Graphics 500 13 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 1124) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2114 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.59% Terrible	Lighting 1.6 Reflection 2.1 Parallax 1.8 1% 1.83 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 1.7 Splatting 3.1 2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.59% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS64GSSD420K 64GB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: P1225CE SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 186 175 206 192 210 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	54.4% Above average	Read 310 Write 198 Mixed 207 SusWrite 191 51% 226 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 36.3 4K Mixed 24.6 81% 27 MB/s	DQ Read 122 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 109 83% 112 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 75%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 920GB free Firmware: MS2OA8K0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 187 188 191 193 194 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 181 Write 200 Mixed 22.2 SusWrite 188 106% 148 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 141% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unde RMT3170EB68F9W1600 2x4GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	13.4% Very poor	MC Read 4.1 MC Write 5.5 MC Mixed 4.2 13% 4.6 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 3.2 9% 3.3 GB/s	Latency 207 19% 207 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Aspire XC-730 Builds (Compare 46 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 29%

Raft

Workstation

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire XC-730

CPU
Celeron J3355IntelBench 25%, 929 samples	20x
Pentium J4205IntelBench 33%, 1,095 samples	20x
Celeron J3455IntelBench 29%, 3,455 samples	6x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 15,538 samples	14x
HD Graphics 505IntelBench 2%, 2,850 samples	11x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 7,629 samples	9x

SSD
TS64GSSD420K 64GBTranscendBench 64%, 60 samples	5x
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	3x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $57Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	2x

RAM
Se HMT451S6DFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 18%, 48 samples	13x
Se HMT451S6DFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 27%, 50 samples	7x
ACR16D3LS1KDGR/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 19%, 274 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback