Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA401QM_GA401QM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics71.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive136% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA401QM_GA401QM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GA401QM
Memory34.6 GB free of 40 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220830
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '23 at 11:14
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Memory 79.5
1-Core 164
2-Core 320
100% 188 Pts
4-Core 576
8-Core 919
92% 748 Pts
64-Core 1,095
68% 1,095 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 1722) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 3060 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 532.03
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.7% Very good
Lighting 90.7
Reflection 109
Parallax 108
74% 103 fps
MRender 99.1
Gravity 78.7
Splatting 74
68% 83.9 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 105%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CSSD-M2B02TPG2VN 2TB
451GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 832 854 886 928 882 884 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 202
Write 1,039
Mixed 366
SusWrite 878
143% 621 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 99.9
4K Mixed 29.9
129% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 634
DQ Write 943
DQ Mixed 471
446% 683 MB/s
Poor: 192%
This bench: 136%
Great: 262%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 CT32G4SFD832A.C16FE 39GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 32767 MB
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
62.2% Good
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 19.3
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 22.8
SC Write 24.7
SC Mixed 22.8
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 81.4
49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG Zephyrus G14 GA401QM_GA401QM Builds (Compare 2,632 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA401QM_GA401QM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback