TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Extensa 215-54G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAcer Extensa 215-54G  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Jameson_TL
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221031
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMay 30 '23 at 11:00
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
46% Average
Memory 64.9
1-Core 84.5
2-Core 125
55% 91.3 Pts
4-Core 149
8-Core 206
22% 177 Pts
64-Core 201
12% 201 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑
This bench: 46%
 Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX350
Acer(1025 1465) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3203
Relative performance (0th percentile)
6.01% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 15.7
Parallax 19.4
3% 12.9 fps
MRender 17.4
Gravity 13.7
Splatting 13
12% 14.7 fps
Poor: 12% ↑
This bench: 6.01%
 Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1114 512GB
344GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21113000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 532 306 375 391 415 417 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 1,046
Write 588
Mixed 792
SusWrite 406
158% 708 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 52.4
4K Mixed 42.4
136% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 170
127% 170 MB/s
Poor: 124% ↑
This bench: 117%
 Great: 235%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
33.4% Below average
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 9
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 10.6
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 24% ↑
This bench: 33.4%
 Great: 43%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Extensa 215-54G Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Extensa 215-54G

CPU
Core i5-1135G7IntelBench 69%, 36,962 samples52x
Core i3-1115G4IntelBench 51%, 18,815 samples5x
Core i7-1165G7IntelBench 66%, 51,565 samples3x
GPU
Iris XeIntelBench 14%, 144,774 samples33x
GeForce MX350NvidiaBench 18%, 3,277 samples26x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 9%, 39,662 samples1x
SSD
HFM512GD3JX016N 512GBNvmeBench 244%, 4,593 samples20x
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1114 512GBNvmeBench 186%, 8,325 samples11x
INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GBNvmeBench 197%, 18,245 samples10x
RAM
M471A1G44BB0-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 34%, 7,899 samples18x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 1x8GBMicronBench 35%, 2,450 samples15x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 1x8GBMicronBench 38%, 20,126 samples13x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback