Zoostorm 9876-1748A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive64.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemZoostorm 9876-1748A  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK H81M-K
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '23 at 10:54
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Memory 68.2
1-Core 74.9
2-Core 146
56% 96.5 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 460
44% 362 Pts
64-Core 496
31% 496 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 78%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 128GB SSD 128GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VE0R632D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 170 155 151 142 120 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 332
Write 338
Mixed 219
SusWrite 170
59% 265 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 65.2
4K Mixed 32.4
106% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 70.6
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 96.3
97% 148 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
189GB free
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 89 85 71 76 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 119
Write 120
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 83.2
71% 96.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5273EB0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
46.7% Average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 15.5
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 8.6
27% 9.43 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback