TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Fujitsu CELSIUS W5010

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive233% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS W5010  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3817-A1
Memory58.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220516
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 30 '23 at 10:50
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900K-$430
CPU1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 86.9
1-Core 154
2-Core 304
98% 181 Pts
4-Core 606
8-Core 1,170
105% 888 Pts
64-Core 1,905
118% 1,905 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑
This bench: 100%
 Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Gigabyte(1458 4072)
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Lighting 137
Reflection 122
Parallax 127
112% 129 fps
MRender 144
Gravity 105
Splatting 90.6
90% 113 fps
Poor: 90% ↑
This bench: 103%
 Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G-1016 512GB
312GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10200016
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1030 683 548 632 540 624 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
233% Outstanding
Read 1,949
Write 2,157
Mixed 1,666
SusWrite 676
362% 1612 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 64.3
223% 82.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,224
DQ Write 797
DQ Mixed 970
734% 997 MB/s
Poor: 154% ↑
This bench: 233%
 Great: 261%
WDC WD20EFAX-68B2RN1 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 83.00A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 152 151 152 150 153 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 108
Write 106
Mixed 73.8
SusWrite 151
25% 110 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 12.1
4K Mixed 1.1
56% 15 MB/s
DQ Read 1.2
DQ Write 9.3
DQ Mixed 1.7
2% 4.07 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑
This bench: 28.7%
 Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2G43AB3-CWE 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
90.7% Outstanding
MC Read 33.2
MC Write 35.7
MC Mixed 27.5
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 41.4
SC Mixed 28.1
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 82% ↑
This bench: 90.7%
 Great: 147%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical CELSIUS W5010 Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W5010

CPU
Core i9-10900KIntel  $430Bench 100%, 107,269 samples16x
Core i7-10700Intel  $230Bench 93%, 71,010 samples11x
Core i7-10700KIntel  $224Bench 97%, 198,859 samples7x
GPU
Quadro RTX 4000NvidiaBench 98%, 9,173 samples10x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 39,219 samples6x
Quadro P2200NvidiaBench 47%, 5,007 samples5x
SSD
PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G-1016 512GBWDCBench 221%, 197 samples15x
MZVLB512HBJQ-00000 512GBSamsungBench 248%, 7,447 samples3x
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples3x
RAM
M378A2G43AB3-CWE 2x16GBSamsungBench 90%, 2,006 samples9x
8ATF2G64AZ-3G2E1 2x16GBMicronBench 90%, 590 samples6x
M378A4G43AB2-CVF 2x31.5GBSamsungBench 84%, 262 samples4x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $430
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback