Lenovo 20F5S1KQ00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20F5S1KQ00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20F5S1KQ00
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366x768x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220223
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateMay 29 '23 at 16:54
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
51% Above average
Memory 69.3
1-Core 64.8
2-Core 112
50% 82.1 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 190
26% 190 Pts
64-Core 197
12% 197 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 51%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 504A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9865
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
4.89% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 6.2
5% 4.87 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 9
6% 6.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.89%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9TB8W1T001001 1TB
411GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6117101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 308 369 302 331 330 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 360
Write 357
Mixed 261
SusWrite 324
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 34.3
4K Mixed 20
67% 23.3 MB/s
DQ Read 320
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 190
167% 252 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G43DB0-CPB 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.5% Below average
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 10.4
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 11
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20F5S1KQ00 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20F5S1KQ00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback