TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell OptiPlex 9020

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive205% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell OptiPlex 9020
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 9020  (all builds)
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190530
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 29 '23 at 16:54
Run Duration269 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690-$51
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 83
1-Core 102
2-Core 204
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 363
48% 361 Pts
64-Core 328
20% 328 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑
This bench: 72.6%
 Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Gainward(10B0 1C81) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.6% Poor
Lighting 32.3
Reflection 34.1
Parallax 32.2
26% 32.9 fps
MRender 36.1
Gravity 32.5
Splatting 23
24% 30.5 fps
Poor: 24% ↑
This bench: 25.6%
 Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
844GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 819 870 870 871 868 862 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 944
Write 1,070
Mixed 1,052
SusWrite 860
222% 981 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 62.1
208% 73.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1229
DQ Write 1,034
DQ Mixed 1,142
853% 1,135 MB/s
Poor: 102% ↑
This bench: 205%
 Great: 394%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
193GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 265 265 265 264 262 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 453
Write 401
Mixed 394
SusWrite 262
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 66.5
4K Mixed 44.7
132% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 276
211% 282 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑
This bench: 88.8%
 Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
836GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 193 195 196 198 197 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 121
Mixed 88.6
SusWrite 191
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑
This bench: 106%
 Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B1G73QH0-CK0 M378B1G73QH0-CK0 M378B1G73QH0-CK0 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
59.2% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 17.7
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 20
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 44% ↑
This bench: 59.2%
 Great: 60%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical OptiPlex 9020 Builds (Compare 10,708 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 9020

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel  $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples3,494x
Core i7-4770Intel  $65Bench 70%, 176,321 samples2,245x
Core i5-4590Intel  $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples1,869x
GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel  $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples3,581x
GTX 1650Nvidia  $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples717x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples688x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples393x
KingFast 1TBBench 95%, 2,943 samples233x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples217x
RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples256x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples183x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples178x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $178
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback