Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	4.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

11 months ago, 11 months ago.

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6600U 31,982 User benchmarks, average bench 45% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	13.2% Very poor	Memory 12.8 1-Core 61.8 2-Core 115 31% 63.3 Pts	4-Core 72.6 8-Core 136 12% 104 Pts	64-Core 136 8% 136 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake) 362,113 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Legend(17AA 2238) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	4.84% Terrible	Lighting 5.4 Reflection 3.8 Parallax 5.8 4% 5 fps	MRender 6.9 Gravity 5.3 Splatting 8.2 6% 6.8 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.84% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTY256HDHP-000L7 256GB 1,978 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT25L6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 67 73 73 69 71 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	43.1% Average	Read 351 Write 352 Mixed 246 SusWrite 91.5 58% 260 MB/s	4K Read 13.5 4K Write 12.3 4K Mixed 16.4 48% 14.1 MB/s	DQ Read 189 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 199 146% 191 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix H9CCNNNBJTMLAR H9CCNNNBJTMLAR 8GB 633 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 1867, 1867 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	25.8% Poor	MC Read 9.1 MC Write 11.3 MC Mixed 8.7 28% 9.7 GB/s	SC Read 3.6 SC Write 10 SC Mixed 6 19% 6.53 GB/s	Latency 378 11% 378 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 67%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-6600UIntelBench 45%, 31,982 samples	6x

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	6x

SSD
SSDSCKKF512G8 SATA 512GBIntelBench 93%, 589 samples	2x
MZNTY256HDHP-000L7 256GBSamsungBench 82%, 1,978 samples	2x
SSDSCKKF256H6L 256GBIntelBench 63%, 859 samples	2x

RAM
H9CCNNNBJTMLAR H9CCNNNBJTMLAR 8GBHynixBench 61%, 633 samples	2x
EDFA232A2MA-JD-F EDFA232A2MA-JD-F 8GBElpidaBench 62%, 374 samples	2x
K4E6E304EE-EGCF K4E6E304EE-EGCF 8GBSamsungBench 62%, 933 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16