Acer Nitro N50-640

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics67.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive149% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAcer Nitro N50-640  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Nitro N50-640
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220221
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 29 '23 at 11:16
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400F-$120
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Memory 85.2
1-Core 173
2-Core 325
104% 194 Pts
4-Core 550
8-Core 915
89% 733 Pts
64-Core 1,155
72% 1,155 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Sapphire(174B A630) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 526.56
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
67.7% Good
Lighting 92.2
Reflection 72.5
Parallax 77.8
75% 80.8 fps
MRender 80
Gravity 65.3
Splatting 54.8
53% 66.7 fps
Poor: 64%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON OM8PDP3512B-AA1 512GB
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 287 295 446 265 248 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
149% Outstanding
Read 1,251
Write 1,038
Mixed 1,063
SusWrite 274
203% 907 MB/s
4K Read 47
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 15.8
150% 58.1 MB/s
DQ Read 859
DQ Write 960
DQ Mixed 785
625% 868 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 149%
Great: 215%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
723GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 147 150 148 151 148 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 158
Mixed 82.7
SusWrite 148
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 109%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 42 41 42 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Read 36.1
Write 39.2
Mixed 30.6
SusWrite 40.6
27% 36.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 98%
Seagate External Drive 160GB
39GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Read 51.3
Write 28.8
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 36.7
46% 36.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.7
42% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 16%
SHGS31-1 000GS-2 1TB
631GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.4% Average
Read 54.4
Write 34.5
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 41.9
54% 41.9 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 8.4
4K Mixed 10.3
693% 11.3 MB/s
DQ Read 14.8
DQ Write 13.6
DQ Mixed 15
1,028% 14.5 MB/s
Poor: 111%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 165%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64AZ-3G2B1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
MC Read 34.9
MC Write 33.6
MC Mixed 30.1
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 36.1
SC Mixed 25.4
78% 27.4 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro N50-640 Builds (Compare 1,871 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

System: Acer Nitro N50-640

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $386
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback