Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412FJG_X412FJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics10.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive90.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412FJG_X412FJ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X412FJG
Memory6.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190924
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 29 '23 at 02:56
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8145U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
48.8% Average
Memory 68
1-Core 92.3
2-Core 151
61% 104 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 187
24% 178 Pts
64-Core 175
11% 175 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX230
Asus(1043 159F) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1169
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Lighting 12.9
Reflection 17.6
Parallax 10.5
10% 13.7 fps
MRender 14.5
Gravity 12.6
Splatting 13.1
11% 13.4 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 12%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Optane+238G 256GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 17.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 144 116 91 29 22 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 247
Mixed 324
SusWrite 74.3
63% 287 MB/s
4K Read 61.7
4K Write 66.1
4K Mixed 37.8
177% 55.2 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 171
162% 253 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 12GB
2400, 3200 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
52.4% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 17.4
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 18.3
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412FJG_X412FJ Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412FJG_X412FJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback