Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (78%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-3420 APU 1,139 User benchmarks, average bench 36% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	25.2% Poor	Memory 41.2 1-Core 25.6 2-Core 18.4 22% 28.4 Pts	4-Core 54.4 8-Core 58.3 7% 56.3 Pts	64-Core 56.3 4% 56.3 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 25.2% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6410D 3,128 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 2ACD) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	1.88% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 3.2 Parallax 1.9 2% 2.4 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 2 Splatting 2.9 2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.88% Great: 2%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46 33,785 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4.AAA Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 47.9 Write 60.5 Mixed 22.8 32% 43.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 80% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 42%
Generic- SD/MMC 2GB 218 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 6362 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 14.3 Write 8 Mixed 6.7 11% 9.67 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 13% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 16GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	18.7% Very poor	MC Read 6.2 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 8 20% 6.93 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 1.9 SC Mixed 5 9% 3.3 GB/s	Latency 197 20% 197 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
A6-3600 APUAMDBench 42%, 1,250 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 6530DAMDBench 3%, 4,675 samples	1x

SSD
860 EVO 250G 250GBSamsungBench 86%, 3,453 samples	1x

RAM
HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 46%, 5,138 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16