Asus TUF Gaming FX505GU_FX95GU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive147% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505GU_FX95GU  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505GU
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210208
Uptime11.5 Days
Run DateMay 28 '23 at 03:59
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Memory 92.8
1-Core 115
2-Core 220
82% 142 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 690
68% 557 Pts
64-Core 862
53% 862 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 179F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7584
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.14% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 93.6
Parallax 8.4
5% 36.1 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 11.3
8% 9.93 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.14%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1MA0V4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 958 877 528 525 525 479 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
147% Outstanding
Read 1,011
Write 1,008
Mixed 956
SusWrite 649
204% 906 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 57.5
4K Mixed 40.8
130% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 463
DQ Write 699
DQ Mixed 626
461% 596 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 147%
Great: 181%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
444GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 444 436 437 457 463 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Read 436
Write 402
Mixed 366
SusWrite 447
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 67.5
4K Mixed 35.1
117% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 321
243% 326 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATS1G64HZ-2G6E1 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 16GB
2667, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
75.8% Very good
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 21.2
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 30.1
SC Mixed 23.5
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505GU_FX95GU Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505GU_FX95GU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback