HP HPE-475a

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.58% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	49.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP HPE-475a (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI 2A9C
Memory	1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100712
Uptime	2.7 Days
Run Date	May 28 '23 at 00:30
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	34%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	68.8% Good	Memory 93.3 1-Core 80.3 2-Core 149 66% 107 Pts	4-Core 244 8-Core 338 37% 291 Pts	64-Core 340 21% 340 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670 32,193 User benchmarks, average bench 6% MSI(1462 2530) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	6.58% Terrible	Lighting 8.4 Reflection 9.1 Parallax 7.1 7% 8.2 fps	MRender 8.7 Gravity 6.5 Splatting 7.2 6% 7.47 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.58% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 1TB 17,192 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 612GB free (System drive) Firmware: VD0R3C04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 198 195 203 207 207 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	49.2% Average	Read 190 Write 191 Mixed 191 SusWrite 199 44% 193 MB/s	4K Read 15.6 4K Write 41 4K Mixed 22.1 74% 26.2 MB/s	DQ Read 131 DQ Write 159 DQ Mixed 162 118% 151 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 543GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 151 146 148 148 147 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	86.3% Excellent	Read 153 Write 132 Mixed 77.4 SusWrite 148 93% 128 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 199GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 136 132 136 136 134 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	69.1% Good	Read 106 Write 69.1 Mixed 61.8 SusWrite 135 68% 93 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 114%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB 873 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 13GB free, PID 0cc7 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 7.7 8.3 8.5 8 8.8 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	12% Very poor	Read 52.5 Write 14.7 Mixed 17.2 SusWrite 8.7 25% 23.3 MB/s	4K Read 10.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 39% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
CE80CE80 M378B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GB 100 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	24.6% Poor	MC Read 8 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 6.3 20% 6.97 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 8.2 24% 8.37 GB/s	Latency 61.5 65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 26%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

HP HPE-475a

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)