Toshiba SATELLITE C660

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE C660  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA PWWHA
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20111215
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateMay 27 '23 at 19:06
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
50.7% Above average
Memory 74
1-Core 67.5
2-Core 120
54% 87.3 Pts
4-Core 161
8-Core 162
22% 162 Pts
64-Core 160
10% 160 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 315M
Toshiba(1179 FC90) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.05% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 0.8
Parallax 0.3
1% 0.73 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.05%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 189 215 199 210 186 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 446
Write 248
Mixed 189
SusWrite 200
60% 271 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 49.9
4K Mixed 26.6
99% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 303
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 191
163% 242 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 114%
Toshiba MK6476GSX 640GB-$299
426GB free
Firmware: GS001A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 80 80 80 80 80 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 72.9
Write 83.8
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 80
46% 63.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 48%
ST932032 5AS 320GB
297GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 26 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 56.2
Write 24.7
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 25.3
38% 31.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.6
28% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 830B M2S4G64CB8HG5N-CG 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
48.2% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 16.3
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 13.7
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 92.5
43% 92.5 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE C660 Builds (Compare 549 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C660

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $158
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback