Acer V5-573G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer V5-573G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Dazzle_HW
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150112
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 26 '23 at 23:53
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4500U-$393
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Memory 81.4
1-Core 53.7
2-Core 81.9
49% 72.3 Pts
4-Core 114
8-Core 133
16% 124 Pts
64-Core 134
8% 134 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720M
Acer(1025 079B) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7654
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
2.23% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 0.9
2% 2.63 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 3.4
Splatting 4.3
3% 3.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.23%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SX300 256GB
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.2.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 103 97 101 101 108 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.7% Below average
Read 282
Write 108
Mixed 146
SusWrite 102
35% 159 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 11
4K Mixed 11
45% 12.9 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 54.6
DQ Mixed 69.1
54% 75.3 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR6A-PB HMT451S6MFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.6% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.4
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 12.9
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical V5-573G Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer V5-573G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 31% - Below average Total price: $602
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback