Foxconn Rattler

Performance Results

Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop 65%
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics22.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemFoxconn Rattler  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN Rattler
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 26 '23 at 23:38
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3225-$325
LGA 1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
54.1% Above average
Memory 73.4
1-Core 68.3
2-Core 150
57% 97.1 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 210
27% 206 Pts
64-Core 199
12% 199 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 580-$450
MSI(1462 2550) 1.5GB
CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1024 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Lighting 25.9
Reflection 45.7
Parallax 30.6
21% 34.1 fps
MRender 42.9
Gravity 22.6
Splatting 30
26% 31.8 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 24%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$20
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900612
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 91 63 48 26 23 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.8% Average
Read 227
Write 215
Mixed 183
SusWrite 47.7
38% 168 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 22.9
86% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 144
122% 177 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 87%
Seagate Expansion 320GB
276GB free, PID 2312
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 25 24 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 53.9
Write 23.7
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 24.2
36% 30.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.6
24% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8C-PB 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
28.3% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 8.9
27% 9.47 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 8.6
23% 7.9 GB/s
Latency 93.8
43% 93.8 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Rattler Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 18%
Desktop 70%
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Foxconn Rattler

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 30% - Below average Total price: $775
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback