Performance Results

Gaming 116%
Desktop 101%
Workstation 106%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive71.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C95
MotherboardMSI PRO B550M-VC WIFI (MS-7C95)  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220729
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 26 '23 at 20:23
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 92.1
1-Core 163
2-Core 321
104% 192 Pts
4-Core 588
8-Core 892
92% 740 Pts
64-Core 1,123
70% 1,123 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 101%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
MSI(1462 3367) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 2585 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Lighting 149
Reflection 152
Parallax 142
122% 148 fps
MRender 122
Gravity 151
Splatting 128
109% 133 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 114%
Great: 110%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 189 189 178 168 191 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
71.9% Very good
Read 173
Write 192
Mixed 179
SusWrite 184
41% 182 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 65.8
4K Mixed 45.6
147% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 128
108% 157 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$45
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
MC Read 41.2
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 34.6
95% 33.2 GB/s
SC Read 31.5
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 36.8
88% 30.8 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRO B550M-VC WIFI (MS-7C95) Builds (Compare 553 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 119%
Desktop 103%
Workstation 109%

Motherboard: MSI PRO B550M-VC WIFI (MS-7C95)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $600
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $136
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback