Acer Nitro AN515-54

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive149% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-54  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Octavia_CFS
Memory7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190531
Uptime8 Days
Run DateMay 26 '23 at 19:40
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 78
1-Core 109
2-Core 199
73% 129 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 334
43% 326 Pts
64-Core 321
20% 321 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Acer(1025 1332) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Lighting 35.4
Reflection 37.9
Parallax 37.5
29% 36.9 fps
MRender 27.7
Gravity 38
Splatting 25.2
24% 30.3 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 28%
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1331) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.47% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 37.8
Parallax 6.4
5% 16.7 fps
MRender 9.3
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 9.8
7% 8.3 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.47%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2200_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1MA003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 977 676 537 438 416 278 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
149% Outstanding
Read 1,242
Write 1,155
Mixed 1,087
SusWrite 554
226% 1,009 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 58.8
4K Mixed 41.1
131% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 649
DQ Write 439
DQ Mixed 506
388% 531 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 149%
Great: 239%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 859B CT8G4SFRA266.M8FRS 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.5% Good
MC Read 27
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 20
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 17.9
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 84.2
48% 84.2 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-54 Builds (Compare 11,923 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-54

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback