Monster TULPAR T7 V21.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V21.1  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T7 V21.1
Memory24 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201111
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMay 26 '23 at 18:03
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-10875H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Memory 85.3
1-Core 104
2-Core 256
81% 148 Pts
4-Core 475
8-Core 843
79% 659 Pts
64-Core 1,236
76% 1,236 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1D05 1096) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
3.71% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 102
Parallax 8.4
5% 38.8 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 0.1
2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.71%
Great: 6%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$44
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 60 286 33 36 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 1,027
Write 1,051
Mixed 931
SusWrite 86.8
173% 774 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 86.6
4K Mixed 50.7
169% 58.5 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 126
138% 237 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 112%
Great: 291%
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-00000 512GB
247GB free
Firmware: EXF7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2085 892 794 789 794 795 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
266% Outstanding
Read 2,403
Write 2,123
Mixed 1,725
SusWrite 1,025
407% 1,819 MB/s
4K Read 54.8
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 69.5
225% 74.8 MB/s
DQ Read 946
DQ Write 740
DQ Mixed 836
627% 841 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 266%
Great: 316%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.C8FE CT16G4SFRA32A.C8FB 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.7% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 21.1
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 29.9
SC Mixed 24.1
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 53 144 17.3" 1280 720 BOE07B6
Typical TULPAR T7 V21.1 Builds (Compare 85 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V21.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $300Nvidia RTX 3060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i5-12600K $225Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $300Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $86
Intel Core i5-12400F $150Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $780Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $67G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback