Monster TULPAR T7 V21.1

Performance Results

Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop 80%
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V21.1  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T7 V21.1
Memory24 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201111
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMay 26 '23 at 18:03
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10875H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Memory 85.3
1-Core 104
2-Core 256
81% 148 Pts
4-Core 475
8-Core 843
79% 659 Pts
64-Core 1,236
76% 1,236 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1D05 1096) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
3.71% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 102
Parallax 8.4
5% 38.8 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 0.1
2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.71%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 60 286 33 36 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 1,027
Write 1,051
Mixed 931
SusWrite 86.8
173% 774 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 86.6
4K Mixed 50.7
169% 58.5 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 126
138% 237 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 112%
Great: 253%
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-00000 512GB
247GB free
Firmware: EXF7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2085 892 794 789 794 795 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
266% Outstanding
Read 2,403
Write 2,123
Mixed 1,725
SusWrite 1,025
407% 1,819 MB/s
4K Read 54.8
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 69.5
225% 74.8 MB/s
DQ Read 946
DQ Write 740
DQ Mixed 836
627% 841 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 266%
Great: 316%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.C8FE CT16G4SFRA32A.C8FB 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.7% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 21.1
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 29.9
SC Mixed 24.1
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T7 V21.1 Builds (Compare 110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop 77%
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V21.1

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback