Lenovo 82ND

Performance Results

Gaming 19%
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 19%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive139% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemLenovo 82ND  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230105
Uptime12.7 Days
Run DateMay 26 '23 at 18:02
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Memory 67.9
1-Core 121
2-Core 279
82% 156 Pts
4-Core 530
8-Core 850
85% 690 Pts
64-Core 1,042
64% 1,042 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 3802) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.40.40
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Lighting 20.7
Reflection 16.1
Parallax 28.4
17% 21.7 fps
MRender 14.2
Gravity 22.4
Splatting 21.3
16% 19.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
367GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.1C0628
SusWrite @10s intervals: 607 342 310 311 312 314 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 1,243
Write 877
Mixed 794
SusWrite 366
182% 820 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 74.8
4K Mixed 43.7
147% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 706
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 452
340% 468 MB/s
Poor: 121%
This bench: 139%
Great: 210%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.7% Above average
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 19.8
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 16.9
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82ND Builds (Compare 348 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 15%
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation 15%

System: Lenovo 82ND

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $136
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback