Lenovo 20T4000KFR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
12 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemLenovo 20T4000KFR  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20T4000KFR
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 26 '23 at 12:58
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10610U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
43.4% Average
Memory 62.2
1-Core 126
2-Core 185
70% 124 Pts
4-Core 142
8-Core 155
20% 149 Pts
64-Core 182
11% 182 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 22B5) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2114
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.52% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.9 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 1
Splatting 0.7
1% 0.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 0.52%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512G-1001 512GB
402GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11170101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 166 127 139 150 149 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 734
Write 585
Mixed 869
SusWrite 175
132% 591 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 32
4K Mixed 19.1
80% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 58
DQ Mixed 135
92% 115 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 278%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAB2GS6AMR6N-XN Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CWE 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
43.4% Average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 17.7
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 11.5
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20T4000KFR Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20T4000KFR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback