Asus H87-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics56.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
MotherboardAsus H87-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140120
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateMay 26 '23 at 12:36
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
58% Above average
Memory 73.1
1-Core 89
2-Core 171
64% 111 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 277
34% 261 Pts
64-Core 275
17% 275 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
PNY(196E 1350) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.7% Above average
Lighting 74.2
Reflection 75.8
Parallax 71.3
60% 73.8 fps
MRender 60.1
Gravity 67.7
Splatting 55.3
50% 61 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 521ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 120 126 125 104 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 254
Write 137
Mixed 189
SusWrite 110
38% 172 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 56.2
4K Mixed 25.5
97% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 130
102% 140 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 73%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
264GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 134 136 136 130 135 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 123
Write 114
Mixed 73.7
SusWrite 134
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
215% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 0420 F3-12800CL9-4GBSR KHX1600C9D3/4GX 0420 F3-12800CL9-4GBSR 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
46.5% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 15
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 13.8
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 94.4
42% 94.4 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H87-PLUS Builds (Compare 855 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87-PLUS - $128

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $284
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback