Gigabyte GA-A320M-HD2-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics37.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemGigabyte A320M-HD2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-HD2-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220727
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 26 '23 at 07:34
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
81% Excellent
Memory 80.1
1-Core 116
2-Core 228
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 697
70% 569 Pts
64-Core 790
49% 790 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 81%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1260 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.4.3
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.8% Below average
Lighting 44.6
Reflection 57.4
Parallax 67.2
36% 56.4 fps
MRender 56.7
Gravity 53.4
Splatting 42.3
41% 50.8 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900T13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 447 453 284 42 323 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Read 408
Write 252
Mixed 370
SusWrite 330
76% 340 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 80.2
4K Mixed 37.6
143% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 186
172% 261 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 91%
Hitachi HUA722010CLA330 1TB-$45
762GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 136 123 135 135 135 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
74% Very good
Read 125
Write 136
Mixed 66.4
SusWrite 133
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 74%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF2666C16D4/8G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
MC Read 37.5
MC Write 34.5
MC Mixed 30.5
98% 34.2 GB/s
SC Read 25.2
SC Write 35
SC Mixed 28.2
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-HD2-CF Builds (Compare 199 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-HD2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $226
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback