bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics36.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 26 '23 at 00:24
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 79
1-Core 92.9
2-Core 185
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 630
61% 500 Pts
64-Core 656
41% 656 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Gigabyte(1458 2310) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 31.0.12027.9001
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36.9% Below average
Lighting 42.3
Reflection 55.6
Parallax 76.9
34% 58.3 fps
MRender 57.6
Gravity 56.9
Splatting 42.2
42% 52.2 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 137GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 156 268 282 295 286 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 473
Write 40.1
Mixed 274
SusWrite 234
56% 255 MB/s
4K Read 9.6
4K Write 9
4K Mixed 8
30% 8.87 MB/s
DQ Read 19.5
DQ Write 18.2
DQ Mixed 19
14% 18.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB 1x16GB
1 of 128 slots used
16GB DIMM DRAM
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
78.6% Very good
MC Read 35
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 28.7
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.6
24% 8.5 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,437 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback