HP ProBook 6470b

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemHP ProBook 6470b  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 179C
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190415
Uptime12.2 Days
Run DateMay 25 '23 at 17:16
Run Duration93 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2620M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
52.7% Above average
Memory 76
1-Core 68.9
2-Core 128
56% 91 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 176
23% 174 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
HP(103C 179C) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.82% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 1.6
2% 1.8 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 2.7
2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.82%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDAS256 256GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1211A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 414
Write 350
Mixed 307
79% 357 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 53
4K Mixed 14.5
70% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 26.5
58% 119 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-YK0 Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.3% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 8.7
24% 8.33 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.9
19% 6.5 GB/s
Latency 88.3
45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 6470b Builds (Compare 554 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 6470b

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $227
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback