Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_X512DA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics8.21% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive99.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_X512DA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512DA
Memory13.9 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220928
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 24 '23 at 21:34
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
44.9% Average
Memory 52.5
1-Core 84.4
2-Core 145
53% 93.9 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 440
37% 321 Pts
64-Core 360
22% 360 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 1821) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 23.4.3
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
8.21% Terrible
Lighting 10.4
Reflection 8.3
Parallax 15.2
8% 11.3 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 12.3
Splatting 10.4
8% 9.13 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.21%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1202 256GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20200000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 417 423 428 430 429 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Read 833
Write 739
Mixed 660
SusWrite 435
150% 667 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 41.3
4K Mixed 27.9
93% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 283
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 264
193% 253 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 189%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC CT16G4SFD824A.C16FDD 20GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
47.3% Average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 16.2
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 13.7
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_X512DA Builds (Compare 558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_X512DA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback