HP 15 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 15 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 21BC
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141007
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateMay 24 '23 at 17:51
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Memory 84
1-Core 76.4
2-Core 115
58% 91.8 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 186
24% 184 Pts
64-Core 182
11% 182 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 21BC) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5069
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.09% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 3.1
Parallax 2.7
3% 3.2 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.6
3% 3.67 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.09%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 120G 120GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN08921
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 358 388 393 398 144 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 424
Write 408
Mixed 400
SusWrite 338
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 55.7
4K Mixed 27.1
96% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 235
179% 238 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 78%
Great: 98%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
323GB free
Firmware: GG2OAH10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 86 86 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
49% Average
Read 85.6
Write 79.3
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 85.1
51% 70.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 49%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ40UG8EFU0-GN-F Samsung M471B5173CB0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.1% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.5
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 11.5
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 15 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 3,239 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 15 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback