TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Nitro AN515-52

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-52  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Freed_CFS
Memory4.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190805
Uptime8 Days
Run DateMay 23 '23 at 23:15
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 114
2-Core 203
79% 136 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 460
49% 392 Pts
64-Core 460
28% 460 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 75.7%
 Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1264) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
4.11% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 30.1
Parallax 6.5
4% 14 fps
MRender 8.9
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 0
3% 4.8 fps
Poor: 4% ↑
This bench: 4.11%
 Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ430400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 67 35 23 37 27 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 395
Write 329
Mixed 281
SusWrite 66.1
60% 268 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 28.4
4K Mixed 12.3
50% 17.7 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 94.4
DQ Mixed 35.6
45% 81.4 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 39.6%
 Great: 55%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
36GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 56 59 58 61 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 81.9
Write 88.7
Mixed 57.6
SusWrite 59.1
53% 71.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑
This bench: 40.6%
 Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SF4641G8CK8IEHLSBG Kingston 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.2% Good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 20
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 20.6
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 62% ↑
This bench: 65.2%
 Great: 86%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Nitro AN515-52 Builds (Compare 5,501 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-52

CPU
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples3,761x
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples1,739x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples1x
GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples2,920x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples1,516x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples688x
SSD
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples834x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 168%, 18,999 samples257x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples197x
RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples603x
ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 42%, 19,360 samples415x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples279x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback