| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 54.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 73.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Biostar A320MH (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20201105 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 22 '23 at 14:35 |
| Run Duration | 113 Seconds |
| Run User | IDN-User |
| Background CPU | 14% |
PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
64.6%
Good
|
68% 118 Pts
|
52% 432 Pts
|
35% 572 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$240
Nvidia(10DE 21C4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.79
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
54.7%
Above average
|
53% 65.3 fps
|
58% 73.9 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900615
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 114 152 79 63 54 MB/s
|
73.2%
Very good
|
70% 312 MB/s
|
119% 43.7 MB/s
|
151% 225 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown D4H4GL32A8TS 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
81.6%
Excellent
|
84% 29.5 GB/s
|
72% 25.1 GB/s
|
42% 95.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320MH Builds (Compare 1,805 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Biostar A320MH
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 266x |
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 196x |
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 123x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 127x |
| Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples | 125x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 111x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $338 |