Dell Latitude E7450

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemDell Latitude E7450  (all builds)
MotherboardDell
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160517
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMay 22 '23 at 13:31
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5300U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
31% Below average
Memory 34
1-Core 75
2-Core 133
43% 80.8 Pts
4-Core 156
8-Core 194
22% 175 Pts
64-Core 167
10% 167 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 31%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Dell(1028 062E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
3.68% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 5.4
3% 4 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 6.2
4% 5.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.68%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fc700 256GB 256GB
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0203A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 145 7.7 22 324 310 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 364
Write 324
Mixed 320
SusWrite 184
67% 298 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 30.1
4K Mixed 12.1
52% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 35.4
49% 88.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 Micron 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
20% Poor
MC Read 6.4
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 7.4
22% 7.8 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 2.6
7% 2.43 GB/s
Latency 232
17% 232 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E7450 Builds (Compare 2,459 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E7450

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback