Lenovo 20132

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.74% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive60.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20132  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO INVALID
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121011
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 07 '17 at 03:02
Run Duration90 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
56.4% Above average
Memory 92.7
1-Core 32.9
2-Core 65.3
46% 63.6 Pts
4-Core 113
8-Core 161
17% 137 Pts
64-Core 163
10% 163 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660M
Legend(17AA 3977) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8843
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
7.74% Terrible
Lighting 8.47
Reflection 8.04
Parallax 9.16
7% 8.55 fps
MRender 11.8
Gravity 10.5
Splatting 11.9
9% 11.4 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.74%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 507
Write 246
Mixed 298
77% 350 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 52.4
4K Mixed 14.4
80% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 26.1
DQ Write 52.3
DQ Mixed 49.8
35% 42.7 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BF160B.C16 CT102464BF160B.T16 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
48.9% Average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.6
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.7
21% 7.3 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20132 Builds (Compare 170 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $420
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback