Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LU_FX566LU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics25.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive175% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LU_FX566LU  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX506LU
Memory6.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211126
Uptime11.9 Days
Run DateMay 22 '23 at 10:31
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10870H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Memory 75.8
1-Core 78.3
2-Core 150
60% 101 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 427
38% 320 Pts
64-Core 659
41% 659 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Asus(1043 18DF) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3179
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.5% Poor
Lighting 30.1
Reflection 39.3
Parallax 34.6
24% 34.7 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 37.9
Splatting 45.2
27% 31.3 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 72%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA1T0QFD 1TB
459GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P6MA001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 858 843 1031 1176 1205 1181 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
175% Outstanding
Read 1,351
Write 1,248
Mixed 1,023
SusWrite 1,049
262% 1,168 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 55.8
4K Mixed 36
129% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 444
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 309
255% 368 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 175%
Great: 301%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.2% Good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 21.6
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 17
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 88.7
45% 88.7 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LU_FX566LU Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LU_FX566LU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback