| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 94.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus X99-A/USB 3.1 (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit farver |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150810 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | May 22 '23 at 09:04 |
| Run Duration | 132 Seconds |
| Run User | DNK-User |
| Background CPU | 17% |
PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
|
75.7%
Very good
|
68% 114 Pts
|
58% 477 Pts
|
46% 734 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 85F4) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.94
|
14.1%
Very poor
|
14% 17.9 fps
|
14% 16.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 181 134 133 131 133 MB/s
|
94.2%
Outstanding
|
82% 365 MB/s
|
155% 51.9 MB/s
|
266% 356 MB/s
|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
60GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 196 156 157 156 154 MB/s
|
97.5%
Outstanding
|
71% 319 MB/s
|
162% 53.9 MB/s
|
266% 356 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 9905622-024.A00G 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
97.5%
Outstanding
|
108% 37.6 GB/s
|
51% 17.9 GB/s
|
56% 71.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,298 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples | 766x |
| Core i7-5930KIntel $150Bench 80%, 34,039 samples | 197x |
| Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples | 92x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 118x |
| GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 116x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 109x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 95% - Outstanding | Total price: $352 |