MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.56% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive71.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C51
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201208
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 22 '23 at 08:17
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A12-8870 R7, 12 COMPUTE CORES 4C+8G
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
41.1% Average
Memory 46.2
1-Core 73.1
2-Core 140
48% 86.2 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 211
28% 209 Pts
64-Core 207
13% 207 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
MSI(1462 7C51) 80MB
Ram: 80MB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.56% Terrible
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 7.1
Parallax 13.1
6% 9.23 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 14.4
Splatting 8.7
7% 9 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.56%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate BarraCuda SSD ZA500CM10002 500GB
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STAS1024
SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 172 253 349 185 361 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 381
Write 343
Mixed 293
SusWrite 265
72% 320 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 43.6
4K Mixed 24.9
84% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 342
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 224
195% 289 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT4G4DFS8266.M8FF 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.8% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 7.7
23% 8.07 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 6.8
18% 6.17 GB/s
Latency 176
23% 176 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) Builds (Compare 3,888 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $300
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback