HP 22-a113w

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 22-a113w  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B43
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150720
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 22 '23 at 02:56
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3260T
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
40% Below average
Memory 61.4
1-Core 75.7
2-Core 100
49% 79.2 Pts
4-Core 111
8-Core 104
15% 107 Pts
64-Core 106
7% 106 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 40%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)
HP(103C 2B43) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.65% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 3
2% 2.2 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2.2
2% 2.53 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.65%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 250GB SSD
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900615
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 72 73 72 72 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 355
Write 92.1
Mixed 285
SusWrite 88.1
45% 205 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 37.9
4K Mixed 21.6
75% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 197
160% 226 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 M471B5273CH0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
38.9% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 13.4
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 13.5
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 22-a113w Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 22-a113w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $75
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback