HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 147%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 134%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics158% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84FD
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200528
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 21 '23 at 21:30
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700F-$279
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Memory 92.7
1-Core 132
2-Core 276
92% 167 Pts
4-Core 539
8-Core 959
90% 749 Pts
64-Core 953
59% 953 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$459
PNY(196E 138C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
158% Outstanding
Lighting 232
Reflection 215
Parallax 209
189% 219 fps
MRender 249
Gravity 157
Splatting 128
140% 178 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 158%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG-8310A 512GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 924
Write 692
Mixed 729
174% 782 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 55.4
4K Mixed 41.9
141% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 737
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 295
255% 395 MB/s
Poor: 77% Great: 182%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
58GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 145 146 147 147 147 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 143
Write 130
Mixed 75
SusWrite 145
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
219% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4U9D8ME-16X HP26D4U6D8ME-16X 32GB
2666, 2666 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
81% Excellent
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 25.6
81% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 25.6
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 81%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx Builds (Compare 6,172 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $329
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback