Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory20.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 21 '23 at 15:02
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7267U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
30.2% Below average
Memory 45.5
1-Core 61.3
2-Core 83.5
38% 63.4 Pts
4-Core 81.6
8-Core 122
13% 102 Pts
64-Core 144
9% 144 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus 650 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2121
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
4.37% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 5.8
4% 5.2 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 5.5
5% 5.67 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 4.37%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
C2000 256GB
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0429A0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 654 304 317 182 305 556 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Read 659
Write 539
Mixed 478
SusWrite 386
116% 515 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 49
4K Mixed 20.5
100% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 321
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 253
201% 281 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 208%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown WJD8G8M08N2666 859B CT16G4SFRA32A.M8FB 24GB
2667, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.3% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 10.4
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 7
18% 6.37 GB/s
Latency 178
22% 178 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,741 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback